On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 12:44:51PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Hello, > > while working on gpiolib I noticed that gpio_request_one() repeatedly > checks the validity of the gpio_info obtained by gpio_to_desc(). > > This series introduces some helper functions (prefixed gpioinfo_) that > take an gpio_info instead of a plain gpio number and assume this pointer > to be valid. > > The saved runtime is probably too small to measure, so I didn't even > try. Semantically there is no change intended. > > Best regards > Uwe > > Uwe Kleine-König (2): > gpiolib: reorder functions > gpiolib: introduce helper functions working on gpio_info structs > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 243 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- > 1 file changed, 150 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-) Applied, thanks Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
