On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 08:36:37PM +0100, Lucas Stach wrote: > Calling arm_cpu_lowlevel_init() from zynq_cpu_lowlevel_init() adds a stack > push/pop to the latter function which doesn't work this early in the boot. > > As the BootROM apparently hands proccessor control to us in abort(!?!) > mode, setting up a stack requires duplicating most of arm_cpu_lowlevel_init(). > To get around this catch-22 move the call to arm_cpu_lowlevel_init back into > the board lowlevel start function, so we don't need a stack at all. > > Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <dev@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/arm/boards/avnet-zedboard/lowlevel.c | 1 + > arch/arm/mach-zynq/cpu_init.c | 2 -- > 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) Applied, thanks Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
