On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 09:15:52AM +0100, Stefan Riedmüller wrote: > Hi Sascha, > > On 10.12.19 09:05, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 08:50:41AM +0100, Stefan Riedmüller wrote: > > > Hi Sascha, > > > > > > On 09.12.19 16:37, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > > On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 01:31:40PM +0100, Stefan Riedmueller wrote: > > > > > Change environment device-path from using a separate label to > > > > > referencing a device plus partname. > > > > > > > > Why? The way it was is fine. > > > > > > Just to be consistent with phyCORE and phyFLEX. Is there a downside I'm not > > > aware of? > > > > It feels more natural to directly point to the partition, that's why I > > prefer that way. So if you don't have a good reason I suggest to convert > > it the other way round for consistency > > I will recheck if there was a specific reason for us to use the partname > approach. But you can drop this patch for now. I just tried. The series doesn't apply on current master. Could you rebase it? Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
