On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 05:35:27PM -0700, Andrey Smirnov wrote:
> Layerscape and i.MX have different semantics of Watermark Level
> Register. Whereas the former uses "0" to signify maximum allowed
> value, the latter does not.
>
> According to the RM (i.MX8MQ, i.MX6):
>
> "...The read burst length must be less than or equal to the read
> watermark level.."
>
> Setting Watermark Level Register to zero violates that limitation. It
> appears that, on i.MX8MQ, not following that rule causes certain
> configs + toolchains to result in non-bootable image. Specifically,
> polling for CICHB, CIDHB and DLA to clear in esdhc_send_cmd() times
> out. There doesn't appear to be any clear relationship as to what kind
> of image will have the problem, but the following combinations failed
> to boot on ZII i.MX8MQ Zest board:
>
> - gcc version 9.2.1 20190827 (Red Hat Cross 9.2.1-1) (GCC) +
> imx_v8_defconfig + CONFIG_DEBUG_LL and CONFIG_PBL_CONSOLE
>
> - gcc version 5.5.0 (Timesys 20190405) (custom toolchain) +
> imx_v8_defconfig
>
> Setting WML's *_BRST_LE to 16 and *_WML to 128 on i.MX resolves the
> issue (same setting that's selected by writing 0 on Layerscape).
>
> Fixes: 48562aeaa8 ("esdhc-xload: check for PRSSTAT_BREN only after each block")
> Cc: Chris Healy <cphealy@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ruslan Sushko <ruslan.sushko@xxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
Applied, thanks
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
