On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 04:02:45PM +0200, Bastian Krause wrote: > > On 7/17/19 12:31 PM, Ahmad Fatoum wrote: > > > > > > On 17/7/19 12:02, Roland Hieber wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 12:58:36PM +0200, Bastian Krause wrote: > >>> By default systemd generates a machine id on first boot and tries to > >>> persist it (see `man machine-id`). When the root file system is read-only > >>> systemd cannot persist the machine id. In case multiple redundant slots > >>> are used the machine id will vary. When not handled explicitly the > >>> machine id will also change during updates. > >>> > >>> It is possible to pass a machine id to the kernel which will be used by > >>> systemd (systemd.machine_id=). > >>> > >>> This adds functionality to pass device-specific information that will be > >>> hashed to generate a persistent unique machine id. The machine id will > >>> be finally added to the kernel parameters via the > >>> linux.bootargs.machine_id global variable. > >>> > >>> Note: if multiple sources provide hashable device-specific information > >>> (via machine_id_set_hashable()) the information provided by the last call > >>> prior to the late initcall set_machine_id() is used to generate the > >>> machine id from. Thus when updating barebox the machine id might change. > >> > >> I would also add this paragraph to the kconfig help text, so it is more > >> visible for users. > > > > Maybe add a priority parameter like we do with e.g. reset reason? > > That way we can have a base machine-id in the OTP, but board code can > > override it with e.g. an EEPROM value which is given higher priority. > > Hm, that makes things complicated. At the end everybody will have their > own high priority call like.. > > machine_id_set_hashable(my_board_specific_info, len, 99); > > .. to have a machine id that persists such an update scenario? That does > not sound too good to me.. > > Any opinions on this? I don't think there's going to be a race for priorities. But anyway, I think we can introduce priorities when we really have a need for them. Just introducing them because we might need them some day seems like unnecessary overhead to me. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
