Re: [PATCH] Documentation: user: suggest U-Boot's bootm, not go

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 04:18:46PM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> Unlike barebox, U-Boot's go command doesn't have any provisions
> for cache handling and as such, bootstrapping barebox via go can
> cause stale data to be erroneously executed as instructions.
> 
> The official documentation[1] suggests use of bootm instead, which
> does the necessary flushing and invalidation. Update our documentation
> accordingly.
> 
> [1]: http://www.denx.de/wiki/view/DULG/UBootStandalone#Section_5.12.3.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  Documentation/user/barebox.rst | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Applied, thanks

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Embedded]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux