Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] watchdog: add stm32 watchdog and reset driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Ladislav,

On 11/6/19 16:39, Ladislav Michl wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 03:26:10PM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
>> On 11/6/19 14:14, Ladislav Michl wrote:
>>> +static int __init at91wdt_probe(struct device_d *dev)
>>> +{
>>> +	u32 tmp, delta, value;
>>> +	struct resource *iores;
>>> +	struct at91wdt *wdt;
>>> +
>>> +	wdt = xzalloc(sizeof(*wdt));
>>> +	if (!wdt)
>>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> xfuncs never fail so no need to check.
> 
> That's heavily modified kernel driver, so it is probably ok to add just
> another modification and remove check :)
> 
>>> +
>>> +	iores = dev_request_mem_resource(dev, 0);
>>> +	if (IS_ERR(iores))
>>> +		return PTR_ERR(iores);
>>> +
>>> +	wdt->base = IOMEM(iores->start);
>>> +
>>> +	tmp = wdt_read(wdt, AT91_WDT_MR);
>>> +	if (tmp & AT91_WDT_WDDIS) {
>>> +		dev_err(dev, "watchdog is disabled\n");
>>> +		return -EINVAL;
>>> +	}
>>
>> This precludes the possibility of monitoring kernel boot:
>> barebox enables the watchdog at boot or keeps polling till
>> shortly after and then watchdog remains untouched till userspace
>> comes up. The system integrator should be able to configure the
>> watchdog for this scenario.
> 
> That is not how the hardware works. SoC powers up with watchdog enabled
> and system integrator can only disable it or modify timeout (plus
> some other here non-important settings). So if barebox-mlo (or
> at91bootstrap) disable watchdog - AT91_WDT_WDDIS bit is set - we
> can only bail out. There is no way to enable it again.

Ah, that was the missing part on my side: The watchdog is on-by-default.

> 
>>> +
>>> +	value = tmp & AT91_WDT_WDV;
>>> +	delta = (tmp & AT91_WDT_WDD) >> 16;
>>> +
>>> +	wdt->wdd.timeout_max = ticks_to_secs(value);
>>> +	wdt->wdd.timeout_cur = ticks_to_secs((value + delta) / 2);
>>> +	wdt->wdd.set_timeout = at91_wdt_set_timeout;
>>> +	wdt->wdd.poller_enable = 1;
>>> +	wdt->wdd.hwdev = dev;
>>
>> clock enable?
> 
> Driven by slow clock oscilator. Could be done but it fact just
> makes code bigger.
> 
>>> +
>>> +	return watchdog_register(&wdt->wdd);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static const struct of_device_id at91_wdt_dt_ids[] = {
>>> +	{ .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9260-wdt" },
>>
>> The driver can be used for the sama5d4 watchdog as well.
>>
>>> +	{ /* sentinel */ }
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static struct driver_d at91_wdt_driver = {
>>> +	.probe		= at91wdt_probe,
>>> +	.name		= "at91_wdt",
>>> +	.of_compatible = DRV_OF_COMPAT(at91_wdt_dt_ids),
>>> +};
>>> +device_platform_driver(at91_wdt_driver);
>>> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/at91sam9_wdt.h b/drivers/watchdog/at91sam9_wdt.h
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000..390941c65
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/at91sam9_wdt.h
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ */
>>> +/*
>>> + * drivers/watchdog/at91sam9_wdt.h
>>> + *
>>> + * Copyright (C) 2007 Andrew Victor
>>> + * Copyright (C) 2007 Atmel Corporation.
>>> + *
>>> + * Watchdog Timer (WDT) - System peripherals regsters.
>>> + * Based on AT91SAM9261 datasheet revision D.
>>> + *
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> +#ifndef AT91_WDT_H
>>> +#define AT91_WDT_H
>>> +
>>> +#define AT91_WDT_CR		0x00			/* Watchdog Control Register */
>>> +#define		AT91_WDT_WDRSTT		(1    << 0)		/* Restart */
>>> +#define		AT91_WDT_KEY		(0xa5 << 24)		/* KEY Password */
>>> +
>>> +#define AT91_WDT_MR		0x04			/* Watchdog Mode Register */
>>> +#define		AT91_WDT_WDV		(0xfff << 0)		/* Counter Value */
>>> +#define			AT91_WDT_SET_WDV(x)	((x) & AT91_WDT_WDV)
>>> +#define		AT91_WDT_WDFIEN		(1     << 12)		/* Fault Interrupt Enable */
>>> +#define		AT91_WDT_WDRSTEN	(1     << 13)		/* Reset Processor */
>>> +#define		AT91_WDT_WDRPROC	(1     << 14)		/* Timer Restart */
>>> +#define		AT91_WDT_WDDIS		(1     << 15)		/* Watchdog Disable */
>>> +#define		AT91_WDT_WDD		(0xfff << 16)		/* Delta Value */
>>> +#define			AT91_WDT_SET_WDD(x)	(((x) << 16) & AT91_WDT_WDD)
>>> +#define		AT91_WDT_WDDBGHLT	(1     << 28)		/* Debug Halt */
>>> +#define		AT91_WDT_WDIDLEHLT	(1     << 29)		/* Idle Halt */
>>> +
>>> +#define AT91_WDT_SR		0x08			/* Watchdog Status Register */
>>> +#define		AT91_WDT_WDUNF		(1 << 0)		/* Watchdog Underflow */
>>> +#define		AT91_WDT_WDERR		(1 << 1)		/* Watchdog Error */
>>> +
>>> +#endif
>>> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/wd_core.c b/drivers/watchdog/wd_core.c
>>> index e6e5ddecd..b0f73baf7 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/watchdog/wd_core.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/wd_core.c
>>> @@ -97,6 +97,9 @@ static int watchdog_register_poller(struct watchdog *wd)
>>>  	p = dev_add_param_bool(&wd->dev, "autoping", watchdog_set_poller,
>>>  			NULL, &wd->poller_enable, wd);
>>>  
>>> +	wd->poller_enable = 1;
>>
>> if (wd->poller_enable)
>> ?
> 
> No. You can only disable watchdog and if you don't, you have to poll it. Thus
> driver has to force poller, otherwise there's no point enabling watchdog
> driver - driver would be reset anyway.

The driver sets ->poller_enable = 1 and watchdog_register_poller checks for it
and turns on the poller if that's the case? Wasn't this your intention?
At the moment it calls watchdog_poller_start unconditionally.

If we add something like this drivers that make use of it should also select
WATCHDOG_POLLER in Kconfig so it's not silently ignored. 

> 
>>> +	watchdog_poller_start(wd);
>>> +
>>>  	return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(p);
>>>  }
>>>  
>>>
>>
>> I find the existing approach of 'have the system integrator configure it via
>> the environment' to be the best approach. After all, they can just skip
>> configuring the watchdog if they want Linux to initialize it, no benefit
>> on enforcing this.
> 
> If you skip watchdog initialization, you have to poll it. In fact there are
> only two options:
> 1) Disable watchdog
> 2) Poll it
> 2a) ...and eventualy reconfigure it for different timeout, but that can
>     be done only once.
> 
>> (I see now I force-on the watchdog even if the PBL
>> hasn't. I'll fix this). What scenarios do you have in mind that aren't
>> covered by this?
> 
> Barebox has no clue whenever it starts executing with watchdog enabled or
> disabled or even how is it configured. This watchdog could be already 
> configured, so poll must occur in window between 0 and WDD (would you
> mind reading manual?).

I see. The STM32MP seems to offer no means either to detect whether the IWDG
watchdog is running as well.

I agree with you. For watchdogs which have such a restricted use, polling by
default seems the way to go. I am not that sure if the driver shouldn't
provide a working set_timeout anyway if the user absolutely wants to use it.


Cheers
Ahmad

> 
> Thank you,
> 	ladis
>> -- 
>> Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
>> Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
>> Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
>> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
> 

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Embedded]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux