AArch64 uses PC-relative addressing instead of absolute one for data
lookups, so compiling switch statement into a LUT shouldn't be a
problem regardless if relocation happened or not. Disassembly of PBL
code looks almost exactly the same with or without this workaround, so
it is clearly not needed. Drop it.
Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Chris Healy <cphealy@xxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm/boards/zii-imx8mq-dev/lowlevel.c | 7 -------
1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boards/zii-imx8mq-dev/lowlevel.c b/arch/arm/boards/zii-imx8mq-dev/lowlevel.c
index 0fd2ddfca..33c007e05 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boards/zii-imx8mq-dev/lowlevel.c
+++ b/arch/arm/boards/zii-imx8mq-dev/lowlevel.c
@@ -179,13 +179,6 @@ ENTRY_FUNCTION(start_zii_imx8mq_dev, r0, r1, r2)
switch (system_type) {
default:
- /*
- * see similar code in
- * arch/arm/boards/zii-vf610-dev/lowlevel.c for
- * reasoning for placing barrier() below.
- */
- barrier();
-
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_LL)) {
relocate_to_current_adr();
setup_c();
--
2.20.1
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
