On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 10:06:26PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > Hi Roland. > > On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 09:42:25PM +0100, Roland Hieber wrote: > > Hi, > > > > this thread has been open for some time now without any more responses. > > The only motion against it was from Oleksij, who asked me remove the > > license headers in favour of having only the SPDX-License-Identifier > > tags. I replied that I think both the human-understandable license > > headers and the machine-readable tags have their own value, but there > > was no further argument. > I agree with Oleksij here. > We have the license information we need expressed using the SPDX tag, > and we shall avoid the remaining license boiler plate. > > If one needs to read the license text it is in the tree. > And when we do not have it in the file one does not have to read > it both in the file and in the tree when this is relevant > to look into. > The rest of us is just glad to have less boilerplate to > drag around with. OK thanks. There was less feedback than I'd hoped for, but what was there went in the same direction, so I'll spin a v2 without the headers. - Roland _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
