On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 5:13 AM Teresa Remmet <t.remmet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hello Andrey,
>
> Am Montag, den 11.02.2019, 18:57 -0800 schrieb Andrey Smirnov:
> > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 7:16 AM Teresa Remmet <t.remmet@xxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Adds minimal support for the sysc interconnect target module found
> > > on many TI SoCs. With this device tree includes have been
> > > rearagned.
> > > We need the driver to probe the child devices of the bus.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Teresa Remmet <t.remmet@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > +
> > > +static const struct of_device_id sysc_match_table[] = {
> > > + { .compatible = "simple-bus", },
> > > + { /* sentinel */ },
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static int ti_sysc_probe(struct device_d *dev)
> > > +{
> > > + int ret;
> > > +
> > > + ret = of_platform_populate(dev->device_node,
> > > sysc_match_table, dev);
> >
> > Is sysc_match_table really necessary? AFAIK that argument can be NULL
> > unless on of the child nodes needs to be treated like a platform bus
> > as well.
>
> My first attempted was using NULL but this does not work. As for
> example the pinmux node (pinmux@800) is child of a simple-bus. And the
> simple-bus itself is a child of a ti-sysc node. See dts/src/arm/am33xx-
> l4.dtsi.
> The kernel does it the same way.
>
Ah, I see, your use-case does require child nodes to be treated as a
platform bus. FWIW, there's also globally visible
of_default_bus_match_table that can probably replace sysc_match_table.
Thanks,
Andrey Smirnov
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
