Hello Sascha and Sam, Am Dienstag, den 12.02.2019, 09:09 +0100 schrieb Sascha Hauer: > Hi Sam, > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 04:41:38PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > Hi Teresa. > > > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 04:16:34PM +0100, Teresa Remmet wrote: > > > Adds minimal support for the sysc interconnect target module > > > found > > > on many TI SoCs. With this device tree includes have been > > > rearagned. > > > > s/rearagned/rearranged" > > > > > We need the driver to probe the child devices of the bus. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Teresa Remmet <t.remmet@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > The implementation is simple, which is always a good thing. > > There is so far nothing TI specific in the implementation except > > for the of_device_id entries. > > Would it be an idea to rename this to a simple-bus driver. > > And then we can add relevant ID's as other may need the same > > functionality. > > ? > > I'm not sure if it's worth it. It could also happen that we'll need > to do > some TI specific initialization in the currently not-so-generic > driver > in which case we would have to fork from the generic driver later. Yes there might be some special initialization added later. That's what I thought, too. At the moment the child devices of a simple bus are populated in of_probe(). If there is any need for a such a generic driver right now. I will rename it. Teresa > > I'm fine with either way. > > Sascha > _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
