Re: [PATCH 0/5] 32-bit lseek and /dev/mem fixes/improvements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 11:33 PM Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 01:44:31PM -0800, Andrey Smirnov wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 6:46 AM Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > This series ontop of Andreys series (minus the patches that I have
> > > reverted) makes /dev/mem work for the whole 64bit address space without
> > > hopefully special casing too much. "fs: set errno in ftruncate()" and
> > > "fs: devfs: forbid truncation when cdev has no truncate operation" are
> > > not directly related, I stumbled upon these while working on the
> > > patches.
> > >
> > > See the full series in -next. Comments welcome, if somethings wrong with
> > > it we can still change.
> > >
> >
> > Not sure why, but the following patches:
> >
> > "fs: Report actual data processed by mem_copy()"
> > "fs: Share code between mem_write()/mem_read()"
>
> I applied these two now (although squashed into a single commit)...
>
> >
> > appear to be missing and, as a result:
> >
> > "fs: Avoid division in mem_copy()"
>
> ...and rewrote this commit message.
>
> >
> > doesn't actually have mem_copy() function in it. Did the two patches
> > above just slipped through the cracks or was there a particular reason
> > you dropped them?
>
> I thought they wouldn't apply anymore, but I was mistaken. Indeed they
> do apply.

OK, cool, good to hear they are back!

Thanks,
Andrey Smirnov

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Embedded]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux