[PATCH RFC] imx6ul-phytec-phycore-som: don't use fsl, no-blockmark-swap for the NAND

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



barebox doesn't honor that property which yields to inconsitencies
between Linux and barebox after for example filling an UBI with a file
system with barebox and then trying to mount that from Linux.

Note this is an interruptive change as it requires to rewrite the flash
to make it working with Linux again.

Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Hello,

I wonder why Phytec chose to use this configuration. Was this just
copied from another board?

Best regards
Uwe

 arch/arm/dts/imx6ul-phytec-phycore-som.dtsi | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/imx6ul-phytec-phycore-som.dtsi b/arch/arm/dts/imx6ul-phytec-phycore-som.dtsi
index d829fdd6fb29..398546d7b92e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/dts/imx6ul-phytec-phycore-som.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/dts/imx6ul-phytec-phycore-som.dtsi
@@ -49,7 +49,6 @@
 	pinctrl-names = "default";
 	pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_gpmi_nand>;
 	nand-on-flash-bbt;
-	fsl,no-blockmark-swap;
 	status = "disabled";
 
 	#address-cells = <1>;
-- 
2.20.1


_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Embedded]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux