On Tue, 2018-12-18 at 08:21 +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 09:10:40AM +0100, Rouven Czerwinski wrote: > > The miniuart uses the core clock as the clock source. This clock is > > fixed by the > > firmware to 250Mhz if enable_uart=1 is set in the config.txt file. > > However a user could still choose to overclock the core frequency, > > which would result in wrong baudrates computed by barebox. > > Retrieve the core clock frequency from the firmware to allow all > > potential > > firmware configurations to work with barebox. > > > > Signed-off-by: Rouven Czerwinski <r.czerwinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > arch/arm/boards/raspberry-pi/rpi-common.c | 7 +++++++ > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boards/raspberry-pi/rpi-common.c > > b/arch/arm/boards/raspberry-pi/rpi-common.c > > index 490aeef..e29177d 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/boards/raspberry-pi/rpi-common.c > > +++ b/arch/arm/boards/raspberry-pi/rpi-common.c > > @@ -309,6 +309,13 @@ static int rpi_console_clock_init(void) > > clkdev_add_physbase(clk, 0x20201000, NULL); > > clkdev_add_physbase(clk, 0x3f201000, NULL); > > > > + clk = > > rpi_register_firmware_clock(BCM2835_MBOX_CLOCK_ID_CORE, > > + "uart1-8250"); > > We don't have this function anywhere in the tree, this breaks > compilation. Yes the base on my series was wrong, its missing a cleanup patch. Do you want a single patch or shall I post a new series which incorporates the suggestions from Roland and you? - Rouven _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
