On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 05:14:07PM +0100, Lucas Stach wrote: > On 64bit arches the file covering the whole address space is larger than > what can be represented in the loff_t type (s64) used for the file size. > Thus the size of this device is interpreted as negative in a lot of > places. Fix this by truncating the size to fit the file size type. > > Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > commands/mem.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) Applied, thanks Sascha > > diff --git a/commands/mem.c b/commands/mem.c > index eb91ade05a88..cdd7a492d0d5 100644 > --- a/commands/mem.c > +++ b/commands/mem.c > @@ -96,7 +96,8 @@ static int mem_probe(struct device_d *dev) > dev->priv = cdev; > > cdev->name = (char*)dev->resource[0].name; > - cdev->size = (unsigned long)resource_size(&dev->resource[0]); > + cdev->size = min(resource_size(&dev->resource[0]), > + (unsigned long long)S64_MAX); > cdev->ops = &memops; > cdev->dev = dev; > > -- > 2.19.1 > > > _______________________________________________ > barebox mailing list > barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox > -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
