On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 9:43 AM Lucas Stach <l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Recent versions of the i.MX8MQ ATF (like the one shipped with Barebox)
> reside in a part of OCRAM, so there is no need to reserve any part of
> SDRAM anymore.
>
Not sure if this will be handled by Barebox, but there's also:
/memreserve/ 0x40000000 0x00020000;
in arch/arm/dts/imx8mq.dtsi, do we want to drop that as well?
Other than that, definitely a good change:
Acked-by: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm/boards/nxp-imx8mq-evk/board.c | 11 -----------
> 1 file changed, 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boards/nxp-imx8mq-evk/board.c b/arch/arm/boards/nxp-imx8mq-evk/board.c
> index 764eadb766a9..7918b5fb3e36 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boards/nxp-imx8mq-evk/board.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/boards/nxp-imx8mq-evk/board.c
> @@ -45,17 +45,6 @@ static int ar8031_phy_fixup(struct phy_device *phydev)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int imx8mq_evk_mem_init(void)
> -{
> - if (!of_machine_is_compatible("fsl,imx8mq-evk"))
> - return 0;
> -
> - request_sdram_region("ATF", 0x40000000, SZ_128K);
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> -mem_initcall(imx8mq_evk_mem_init);
> -
> static int nxp_imx8mq_evk_init(void)
> {
> if (!of_machine_is_compatible("fsl,imx8mq-evk"))
> --
> 2.19.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> barebox mailing list
> barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
