On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 10:22:13PM +0100, Ladislav Michl wrote: > Linux commit b32843b772db adapted for Barebox: Hmm, there's something fishy with markgood functions (trying different board). Debugging now... > nand_base.c shouldn't have to know the implementation details of > nand_bbt's in-memory BBT. Specifically, nand_base shouldn't perform the > bit masking and shifting to isolate a BBT entry. > > Instead, just move some of the BBT code into a new nand_markbad_bbt() > interface. This interface allows external users (i.e., nand_base) to > mark a single block as bad in the BBT. Then nand_bbt will take care of > modifying the in-memory BBT and updating the flash-based BBT (if > applicable). _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
