On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 06:32:27PM -0700, Andrey Smirnov wrote: > Both dev_get_resource() and dev_get_resource_by_name() implement the > same algorithm and differ only in matching criteria. Move that > algoritm into a separate generic function and implement those two > functions using it. > > Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/base/driver.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/base/driver.c b/drivers/base/driver.c > index 22ca96d7e..4c1b6110a 100644 > --- a/drivers/base/driver.c > +++ b/drivers/base/driver.c > @@ -325,14 +325,27 @@ int register_driver(struct driver_d *drv) > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(register_driver); > > -struct resource *dev_get_resource(struct device_d *dev, unsigned long type, > - int num) > +static struct resource * > +dev_get_resource_by_name_or_id(struct device_d *dev, unsigned long type, > + const char *name, int num) The behaviour of this function is a bit ambiguous: type must always match, name must match if given, num must match if name is not given but is otherwise ignored. Given that dev_get_resource() and dev_get_resource_by_name() both implement a simpler behaviour and both are straight forward to read I don't think this is an improvement. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
