Hi,
Am Mi., 10. Okt. 2018 um 10:06 Uhr schrieb Jan Lübbe <jlu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> INT_MAX would need to be relative to the actual type defined in the
> state variable (u32 vs. u8). An alternative would be to have a global
> flag to en-/disable counting.
>
> Currently there is one way to avoid writes to flash in the successful
> case: Use a watchdog and call bootchooser -s, which will cause it to
> skip decrementing if it boots the same target as previously. It seems
> that's not documented, though. :/
"bootchooser -s" seems to do the trick, so I will just use that.
Pretty nice, as I don't have to change vanilla barebox, but can
accomplish the desired behavior with a custom bootstate variable
("disable_counting") and 3 lines of barebox scripting.
#!/bin/sh
if [ "${state.bootstate.disable_counting}" = "1" ]; then
bootchooser -s
fi
boot bootchooser
Now I just have to patch RAUC to reset bootstate.disable_counting
after flash upgrade and set it again after verification, which will be
straight forward.
Thanks!
Am Mi., 10. Okt. 2018 um 10:06 Uhr schrieb Jan Lübbe <jlu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> On Wed, 2018-10-10 at 09:14 +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > Hi Patrick,
> >
> > +Cc Jan and Enrico
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 06:37:25PM +0200, Patrick Huesmann wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm building a RAUC- & bootchooser-based firmware update solution.
> > > The scenario is symmetric rootfs slots, manual update, userspace
> > > (RAUC) marks as good.
> > > It seems to work well, however I noticed that it's always decrementing
> > > and resetting the remaining_attempts of the booted system, not only
> > > when there's an update, but also during regular boot-ups.
> > >
> > > I thought that the RAUC/bootchooser combo was mainly about providing a
> > > safeguard against accidentally "bricking" the system with corrupt or
> > > incomplete firmware updates.
> > > However, the logic of decrementing and later resetting the
> > > remaining_attempts is apparently not limited to the period between
> > > performing the update and the validation (mark as good) of that
> > > update, but also running all the other times the system is booted.
> > >
> > > This can have some undesirable side effects:
> > >
> > > 1) When the boot process is interrupted for any reason (power issues,
> > > brown-out resets, users unplugging the gadget while it boots, etc.)
> > > more than three times in a row (assuming a remaining_attempts reset
> > > value of 3), then bootchooser will happily switch to the fall-back
> > > target, even though there's nothing wrong with the actual target at
> > > all.
> >
> > I think what you want here is the global.bootchooser.reset_attempts=power-on
> > option. With this option bootchooser will reset the remaining attempts
> > to the default value with each power on reset, meaning that the primary
> > target will only become invalid when the watchdog bites you three times
> > in a row, but not when the device is turned off in between.
>
> If you want to ensure that the old system is not booted anymore, you
> should set its priority to zero.
>
> Leaving the old image enabled is useful in cases where you want to
> protect against problems that occur some time after the update.
>
> > > I guess this can be worked around by syncing the fall-back target to
> > > the last updated one, after the last update has been verified as good.
> > > However this brings additional cost & complexity, and feels more like
> > > a hack than a proper solution.
> > >
> > > 2) In every complete boot cycle, there are two writes to the
> > > barebox-state partition (bootchooser decrementing the
> > > remaining_attempts, then userspace resetting the remaining_attempts
> > > when it marks the target as good). For systems that boot up & power
> > > down a lot, this will generate lots of unnecessary flash writes over
> > > time. Probably it won't be enough to actually wear out the flash, but
> > > still it doesn't "feel" quite right. (I jumped through hoops to have a
> > > proper read-only root and would like to limit the overall number of
> > > flash writes when possible).
> > >
> > > I'm thinking of an option that limits the remaining_attempts logic to
> > > the phase when barebox attempts to boot a newly flashed update, until
> > > that update is marked as good later in userspace. There could be an
> > > extra (optional) variable in the barebox-state, that allows the
> > > userspace to deliberately enable/disable the remaining_attempts logic
> > > in barebox.
> >
> > I don't think such an option is available at the moment. Maybe we could
> > declare remaining_attempts=INT_MAX as infinite attempts. Whenever that
> > value is found the remaining_attempts counter wouldn't be decreased.
> >
> > After an update userspace could then set the remaining_attempts counter
> > of the new system to three and the new system would set it to INT_MAX
> > when successfully booted.
>
> INT_MAX would need to be relative to the actual type defined in the
> state variable (u32 vs. u8). An alternative would be to have a global
> flag to en-/disable counting.
>
> Currently there is one way to avoid writes to flash in the successful
> case: Use a watchdog and call bootchooser -s, which will cause it to
> skip decrementing if it boots the same target as previously. It seems
> that's not documented, though. :/
>
> Regards,
> Jan
> --
> Pengutronix e.K. | |
> Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
> Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
