Hi Andrey. > This series is a result of debugging FEC and uSDHC failures on > i.MX8MQ. Patches 1 and 2 are pretty straightforward and shouldn't be > controversial. Patch 3, OTOH, may or may not be a good way to solve > this problem, but it's a good way to start a discussion on the subject > which is my main goal here. > > Feedback is welcome! > > Thanks, > Andrey Smirnov > > Andrey Smirnov (3): > mci: imx-esdhc: Bail out if DMA address is larger than 32-bits > net: fec: Bail out if DMA address is larger than 32-bits In the above patches the checks are distributed to the users. Are there any reason why we could not centralize this check in the dma code? As I assume it is everyone that is constrained to the 32BIT address space. And do we really need these checks if we teach malloc to only provide memory that is DMA'able? For the malloc bits I like that this change is limited to ARM code and not in generic code. Sam _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
