On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 1:39 AM Lucas Stach <l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Andrey,
>
> Am Freitag, den 29.06.2018, 20:47 -0700 schrieb Andrey Smirnov:
> > Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/dts/imx51-zii-rdu1.dts | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/imx51-zii-rdu1.dts b/arch/arm/dts/imx51-
> > zii-rdu1.dts
> > index 7984e5b32..b0e1d0276 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/dts/imx51-zii-rdu1.dts
> > +++ b/arch/arm/dts/imx51-zii-rdu1.dts
> > @@ -24,6 +24,13 @@
> > device-path = &spinor, "partname:barebox-
> > environment";
> > };
> > };
> > + aliases {
> > + /*
> > + * Aliases to match Linux kernel naming in /dev/
> > + */
> > + main-eeprom = &main_eeprom;
> > + dds-eeprom = &dds_eeprom;
> > + };
>
> In Linux we are using the "zii,eeprom-name" property for this purpose.
> Can we use the same in in Barebox, please? I would like to keep the
> differences in the two DTs to a minimum.
>
That's a good point, I haven't thought about doing that. I'll submit a
follow up series to fix that.
Thanks,
Andrey Smirnov
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
