Am Dienstag, den 08.05.2018, 14:29 -0700 schrieb Andrey Smirnov:
> The code in the if () statement is identical to already existing
> dma_inv_rand(). Use it instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm/cpu/mmu.c | 7 ++-----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/mmu.c b/arch/arm/cpu/mmu.c
> index ceb854ac8..b14a869af 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/mmu.c
> @@ -548,11 +548,8 @@ void dma_free_coherent(void *mem, dma_addr_t dma_handle, size_t size)
> void dma_sync_single_for_cpu(dma_addr_t address, size_t size,
> > enum dma_data_direction dir)
> {
> > - if (dir != DMA_TO_DEVICE) {
> > - if (outer_cache.inv_range)
> > - outer_cache.inv_range(address, address + size);
> > - __dma_inv_range(address, address + size);
> > - }
> > + if (dir != DMA_TO_DEVICE)
> > + dma_inv_range(address, address + size);
> }
>
> void dma_sync_single_for_device(dma_addr_t address, size_t size,
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
