Re: [PATCH 4/4] pci: don't hide hard to understand sanity check in size calculation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 11:27 AM, Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello Andrey,
>
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 09:25:59AM -0700, Andrey Smirnov wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 4:30 PM, Uwe Kleine-König
>> <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > +               /*
>> > +                * if maxbase isn't in the form 0b1...10...0 there is something
>> > +                * fishy
>> > +                */
>> > +               if ((maxbase | (maxbase - 1)) != (u32)-1 || maxbase == 0) {
>>
>> U32_MAX instead of (u32)-1 ?
>
> I don't feel strong here.

Me neither. I just read (u32)-1 as a shortcut for 0xffffffff and we
already have a shortcut for that. But if you want to keep using
(u32)-1, then by all means.

Thanks,
Andrey Smirnov

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Embedded]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux