On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 05:49:29PM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote:
> Dual channel mode is a valid mode of operation, so there is no reason to
> print this at the warning level.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/video/imx-ipu-v3/imx-ldb.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Applied, thanks
Sascha
>
> diff --git a/drivers/video/imx-ipu-v3/imx-ldb.c b/drivers/video/imx-ipu-v3/imx-ldb.c
> index 33dbade87007..9b4524274c4e 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/imx-ipu-v3/imx-ldb.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/imx-ipu-v3/imx-ldb.c
> @@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ static int imx_ldb_probe(struct device_d *dev)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> if (dual && i > 0) {
> - dev_warn(dev, "dual-channel mode, ignoring second output\n");
> + dev_info(dev, "dual-channel mode, ignoring second output\n");
> continue;
> }
>
> --
> 2.16.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> barebox mailing list
> barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
