[PATCH 13/78] ARM: aarch64: Add dummy naked attribute

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The naked attribute is not supported on aarch64. To silence the compiler
warning add a dummy naked attribute.

Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/arm/cpu/entry.c               |  2 +-
 arch/arm/cpu/start.c               |  4 ++--
 arch/arm/include/asm/barebox-arm.h | 17 +++++++++++++++--
 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/entry.c b/arch/arm/cpu/entry.c
index 33b1429d4a..b48c1ca11d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/cpu/entry.c
+++ b/arch/arm/cpu/entry.c
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
  * be fine.
  */
 
-void __naked __noreturn barebox_arm_entry(unsigned long membase,
+void NAKED __noreturn barebox_arm_entry(unsigned long membase,
 					  unsigned long memsize, void *boarddata)
 {
 	arm_setup_stack(arm_mem_stack_top(membase, membase + memsize) - 16);
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/start.c b/arch/arm/cpu/start.c
index 171e6ad0eb..9f4213bfb9 100644
--- a/arch/arm/cpu/start.c
+++ b/arch/arm/cpu/start.c
@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ __noreturn void barebox_non_pbl_start(unsigned long membase,
 
 #ifndef CONFIG_PBL_IMAGE
 
-void __naked __section(.text_entry) start(void)
+void NAKED __section(.text_entry) start(void)
 {
 	barebox_arm_head();
 }
@@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ void __naked __section(.text_entry) start(void)
  * First function in the uncompressed image. We get here from
  * the pbl. The stack already has been set up by the pbl.
  */
-void __naked __section(.text_entry) start(unsigned long membase,
+void NAKED __section(.text_entry) start(unsigned long membase,
 		unsigned long memsize, void *boarddata)
 {
 	barebox_non_pbl_start(membase, memsize, boarddata);
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/barebox-arm.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/barebox-arm.h
index 3aea2e070e..170839aaad 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/barebox-arm.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/barebox-arm.h
@@ -161,13 +161,13 @@ static inline unsigned long arm_mem_barebox_image(unsigned long membase,
 #define ENTRY_FUNCTION(name, arg0, arg1, arg2)				\
 	static void __##name(uint32_t, uint32_t, uint32_t);		\
 									\
-	void __naked __section(.text_head_entry_##name)	name		\
+	void NAKED __section(.text_head_entry_##name)	name		\
 				(uint32_t r0, uint32_t r1, uint32_t r2)	\
 		{							\
 			__barebox_arm_head();				\
 			__##name(r0, r1, r2);				\
 		}							\
-		static void __naked noinline __##name			\
+		static void NAKED noinline __##name			\
 			(uint32_t arg0, uint32_t arg1, uint32_t arg2)
 
 /*
@@ -181,4 +181,17 @@ static inline unsigned long arm_mem_barebox_image(unsigned long membase,
 
 #define barebox_image_size (__image_end - __image_start)
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_32
+#define NAKED __naked
+#else
+/*
+ * There is no naked support for aarch64, so do not rely on it.
+ * This basically means we must have a stack configured when a
+ * function with the naked attribute is entered. On nowadays hardware
+ * the ROM should have some basic stack already. If not, set one
+ * up before jumping into the barebox entry functions.
+ */
+#define NAKED
+#endif
+
 #endif	/* _BAREBOX_ARM_H_ */
-- 
2.16.1


_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Embedded]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux