Re: [PATCH] atmel_lcdfb: introduce driver data

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 11:21:19AM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Hi Sasha.
> 
> > > +
> > >  static __maybe_unused struct of_device_id atmel_lcdfb_compatible[] = {
> > > -	{ .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9261-lcdc", },
> > > -	{ .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9263-lcdc", },
> > > -	{ .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9g10-lcdc", },
> > > -	{ .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9g45-lcdc", },
> > > +	{ .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9261-lcdc",	.data = &at91sam9261_config, },
> > > +	{ .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9263-lcdc",	.data = &at91sam9263_config, },
> > > +	{ .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9g10-lcdc",	.data = &at91sam9g10_config, },
> > > +	{ .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9g45-lcdc",	.data = &at91sam9g45_config, },
> > >  	{ .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9g45es-lcdc", },
> > > -	{ .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9rl-lcdc", },
> > > -	{ .compatible = "atmel,at32ap-lcdc", },
> > > +	{ .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9rl-lcdc",	.data = &at91sam9rl_config, },
> > > +	{ .compatible = "atmel,at32ap-lcdc",		.data = &at32ap_config, },
> > >  	{ /* sentinel */ }
> > >  };
> > 
> > Note that we can match on different platform_device_ids aswell, so you
> > could also attach driver_data to platform devices aswell. For an example
> > see drivers/serial/serial_imx.c.
> > 
> > I leave it up to you if you change this patch accordingly, I can also
> > apply it as is.
> 
> I took a look at it today.
> With these Atmel CPUs we have different behaviour of each IP block
> depending on what CPU it is included in which is why I have added
> all these _config blocks (I could have re-used a few).
> 
> So it is not that we see that for example at91sam9rl-lcdc
> is used in many CPU's.
> Adding the platform_id in this case resulted in extra code with no
> added benefit - or at least no benefit I could see.
> I had to maintain both a of_device_id table and a platform_device_id table,
> so it also looked like a duplicate.
> 
> So unless I miss something then the original patch is the best
> solution.

I see your point, so applied your original patch.

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Embedded]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux