On Mon, Jan 01, 2018 at 10:33:32PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > Following patch is more or less untested. > > It is posted to get feedback if this is the right way to > implement support for pwms in at91sam9263 & friends. > > In the kernel there is also a file named pwm-atmel-tcb. > I dunno which is the better starting point. Looks good, but I don't know the hardware and can't say what pwm-atmel-tcb is for. > > The patch will recognize pwm0 on the at91sam9263ek board > (if status = "okay") so it has seen minimal testing. > But I have yet to utilize any of the pwm's. > > While working with this I get the impression that the core > should know about pwm channels and device_d pointer > should be part of the core data. I know it's done like this in Linux. Any good reason to do this in barebox aswell besides of "do it as in Linux"? Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
