Am Donnerstag, den 06.07.2017, 22:53 +0200 schrieb Alexander Kurz:
>
> On Thu, 6 Jul 2017, Lucas Stach wrote:
>
> > Am Mittwoch, den 05.07.2017, 20:33 +0200 schrieb Sam Ravnborg:
> > > From d10f426e1b8cec7de257dabf59e7fe53a591b3c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > From: Sam Ravnborg <srn@xxxxxxx>
> > > Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 22:07:41 +0200
> > > Subject: [PATCH 2/3] gpio: fix null pointer exception when there is no oftree
> > >
> > > In a system with oftree support enabled but with no oftree the
> > > of_gpiochip_scan_hogs() would fail due to device_node equals NULL.
> > >
> > > Check device_node and return with 0 in this situation, as this
> > > mirrors what would have happened before we added support for gpio-hogs.
> > >
> > > Use IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OFDEVICE) to teach compiler to leave
> > > out the of_* specific functions if not needed.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 37e6bee7 ("gpiolib: Add support for GPIO "hog" nodes")
> > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Kurz <akurz@xxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 8 +++++++-
> > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> > > index a3e17ada0..2bd8ef2a8 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> > > @@ -379,6 +379,9 @@ static int of_gpiochip_scan_hogs(struct gpio_chip *chip)
> > > struct device_node *np;
> > > int ret, i;
> > >
> > > + if (!chip->dev->device_node)
> > > + return 0;
> > > +
> > > for_each_available_child_of_node(chip->dev->device_node, np) {
> > > if (!of_property_read_bool(np, "gpio-hog"))
> > > continue;
> > > @@ -416,7 +419,10 @@ int gpiochip_add(struct gpio_chip *chip)
> > > for (i = chip->base; i < chip->base + chip->ngpio; i++)
> > > gpio_desc[i].chip = chip;
> > >
> > > - return of_gpiochip_scan_hogs(chip);
> > > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OFDEVICE))
> > > + return of_gpiochip_scan_hogs(chip);
> > > + else
> > > + return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > void gpiochip_remove(struct gpio_chip *chip)
> >
> > I think this can be simplified to:
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> > index a3e17ada0d39..1a373ef149a5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> > @@ -379,6 +379,9 @@ static int of_gpiochip_scan_hogs(struct gpio_chip
> > *chip)
> > struct device_node *np;
> > int ret, i;
> >
> > + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OFDEVICE) || !chip->dev->device_node)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > for_each_available_child_of_node(chip->dev->device_node, np) {
> > if (!of_property_read_bool(np, "gpio-hog"))
> > continue;
> >
> > The optimizer should be able to work this out. Can you check that this
> > works for you? No need to resend, if it works I'll just commit this.
> This works perfecty fine with gcc-5.2 and gcc-4.6
> (although gcc-4.6 compatibilty broke with commit 4ef026c3048)
Thanks, all. I've pushed the reworked patch together with 1/3 to master.
Patch 3/3 is applied for -next.
Regards,
Lucas
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
