On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 11:36 PM, Nikita Yushchenko <nikita.yoush@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> IMHO, whether any of likes it or not, OF_GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW is an >> existing feature and the only technical question is if it should be >> supported by Barebox on per-driver basis or if there should be a >> central API for it. >> >> Sascha, are you still OK with me proceeding with making and using an >> API, or should I just scrap that and handle this as a part of my >> "usb-no-xcev"? > > Is support for case when this usb-no-xcev's gpio is active high needed? > > If yes, then your questions above are valid. > > If no, then there is third option, completely ignore this aspect of > device tree and just assume that gpio is active low. That is a trivial/easily testable feature to implement, and I am not interested in pursuing "third option" you propose. Thanks, Andrey Smirnov _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
