Re: [PATCH] PPC: request a consistent memory layout (part II)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 12:34:38PM +0200, Juergen Borleis wrote:
> Hi Sascha,
> 
> On Monday 22 May 2017 12:26:43 Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > [...]
> > I have the feeling that we should actively put the vector table to one
> > of the two locations, so we should implicitly know where it is and not
> > have to test the MSR_IP bit.
> 
> Sometimes it depends on the boot mode. You can locate the NOR flash memory 
> at 0x00000 or 0xfff00000 (via bootstrap pins) and in the latter case the 
> vector table is at 0xfff00000 (at least the reset vector)!

Regardless of the bootmode in the end the vector table should be in
SDRAM, no? With a vector table in flash no vector except the reset
vector will point to a valid address and thus we won't be able to catch
any exceptions. Looing at the powerpc code we really do have exception
handling code, but I don't know how broken it actually is.

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Embedded]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux