On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 01:05:47PM +0300, Peter Mamonov wrote:
> Hi Sasha,
>
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 07:20:55AM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > Hi Peter,
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 12:36:15AM +0300, Peter Mamonov wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Peter Mamonov <pmamonov@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/usb/host/uhci-hcd.c | 6 +++++-
> > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/uhci-hcd.c b/drivers/usb/host/uhci-hcd.c
> > > index 9ad4644e8..04d167ee3 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/usb/host/uhci-hcd.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/usb/host/uhci-hcd.c
> > > @@ -554,8 +554,12 @@ static int submit_bulk_msg(struct usb_device *dev, unsigned long pipe,
> > > */
> > > static struct uhci_td *uhci_alloc_int_td(struct uhci_priv *uhci)
> > > {
> > > - return &uhci->tmp_int_td[0];
> > > + int i;
> > >
> > > + for (i = 0; i < USB_MAX_TEMP_INT_TD; i++)
> > > + if (uhci->tmp_int_td[i].dev_ptr == 0)
> > > + return &uhci->tmp_int_td[i];
> > > + return NULL;
> >
> > You have to upstream the uhci driver first before I can apply fixes for
> > it ;)
>
> Right =)
>
> I've just realized it was not accepted... for a good reason:
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/barebox/2016-January/026016.html
Well the driver doesn't look bad from a first glance. You could repost
it with your fixup applied and see what the maintainer says ;)
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
