Re: State Framework and dtb

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

> I should have never implemented this freeing of the stored device tree.
> There are too many pointers in the code to nodes of this tree. Please
> do not use this free/load device tree feature for state.

Sure, I usually avoid using it. Here I use to test it if it is able to
read the dtb or not? Apparently, it "can" read and parse it but at the
boot stage, it does not care.

> So you edited
> the devicetree in the barebox source code, built a new binary with it
> and started it. Now when you enter "of_dump /state@0" you should
> see the state node you created. Is that what happens?

No, not at all. I could not any sign of state (or state@0).
barebox@Phytec phyCORE AM335x:/ of_dump /state@0
Cannot find nodepath /state@0
of_dump: No such file or directory

-- 
Çağlar Kilimci

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Embedded]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux