Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] AT91, at91sam9x5ek updates (part II/III)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 5:19 AM, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Andrey,
>
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 08:04:37AM -0700, Andrey Smirnov wrote:
>> Hi everone,
>>
>> This is v2 of the second batch of AT91 related patches (original thread
>> [1]). The patches gathered in this set are with a few exceptions are
>> patches adding DT probing support for various AT91 drivers.
>>
>> Feedback from Sam has been incorporated, but other than that the code
>> should be as it was in [1].
>>
>> Any feedback is appreciated.
>
> Applied for now, let's see what the autobuilder tells us.
>
> Have you verified the code can still run on AT91 SoCs which don't use
> the common clock code?

Just went back and double checked with the HW I have at my disposal
(SAM5D3 Xplained and AT91SAM9x5EK) and did a basic boot test for
codebase before and after part I + part II.  I found a couple of build
problems (fixup patch sent to the mailing list), but other than that
both boards booted as expected in all cases.

I did have a problem with NAND driver on SAMA5, which was causing
Barebox to hang, but since it was present in the build without any of
my patches, I am inclined to think it is an unrelated regression.

Regards,
Andrey Smirnov

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Embedded]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux