On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 08:04:08PM -0800, Andrey Smirnov wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Uwe Kleine-König
> <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I work with an i.MX6 based hardware that has an i210 pcie device with
> > barebox 2016.11.0 (but there didn't happen anything relevant since them
> > if I'm not mistaken). When enabling all necessary things to make the
> > e1000 bind, the driver seems to hang. The problem is the following code
> > in e1000_get_hw_eeprom_semaphore():
> >
> > /* Get the FW semaphore. */
> > timeout = hw->eeprom.word_size + 1;
> > while (timeout) {
> > swsm = e1000_read_reg(hw, E1000_SWSM);
> > swsm |= E1000_SWSM_SWESMBI;
> > e1000_write_reg(hw, E1000_SWSM, swsm);
> > /* if we managed to set the bit we got the semaphore. */
> > swsm = e1000_read_reg(hw, E1000_SWSM);
> > if (swsm & E1000_SWSM_SWESMBI)
> > break;
> >
> > udelay(50);
> > timeout--;
> > }
> >
> > together with the fact that hw->eeprom.word_size is either 0x200000 or
> > 0x400000. (I saw both values already in three runs) This value is setup
> > in e1000_init_eeprom_params() in the hw->mac_type == e1000_igb case.
> >
> > When waiting log enough the code finally terminates with a failure.
> >
> > In my case there is an 8Mb-Flash equipped on NVM_* that isn't programmed
> > yet. (M25PE80, Page size: 256 bytes, Subsector erase: 4KB, Sector erase: 64KB,
> > Bulk erase: 8Mb)
> >
> > Is someone able to shed some light on where the problem is?
> >
>
> This might be a long shot, but when I was working with that exact
> combination last year (this board
> https://git.pengutronix.de/cgit/barebox/tree/arch/arm/boards/zii-imx6q-rdu2)
> I ran into an issue where while the reads to PCI configuration space
> would work and the card would enumerate, access to registers mapped
> via any of the BARs would return bogus values. Through trial and error
> I was able to come up with a empirical hack to "fix" the issue and was
> able to continue working with the driver.
>
> Several month later Lucas was asked to take a look at the issue and he
> was able to figure out the underlying cause and posted a series of
> patches fixing the problem:
>
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/barebox/2016-November/028438.html
>
> For some reason I am not seeing that whole series even in the latest
> master, let alone 2016.11 codebase, so just to rule out you running
> into the same problem I did, I'd start by applying that whole series
> to your Barebox and seeing if that improves things.
With these patches applied the problem is gone and I see:
e1000 pci-8086:1531.0: Unprogrammed Flash detected, limiting access to first 4KB
0: EEPROM checksum is incorrect!
0: ...register was 0x0000, calculated 0xbaba
e1000 pci-8086:1531.0: probe failed: Invalid argument
and I have
/ ls -l /dev/e1000-nor0
crw------- 4096 /dev/e1000-nor0
Thanks for your valuable hint.
Sascha: If you want, interpret this as "Tested-by:".
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
