Re: [PATCH] spi: i.MX: Add driver for DSPI

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 09:57:35PM -0800, Andrey Smirnov wrote:
> Add driver for DSPI - SPI IP core found on various Freescale/NXP
> products (including Vybrid/VF610).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/spi/Kconfig    |   8 +
>  drivers/spi/Makefile   |   1 +
>  drivers/spi/dspi_spi.c | 413 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 422 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/spi/dspi_spi.c
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/Kconfig b/drivers/spi/Kconfig
> index 43ba8f4..dd1b214 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/spi/Kconfig
> @@ -54,6 +54,14 @@ config DRIVER_SPI_OMAP3
>  	bool "OMAP3 McSPI Master driver"
>  	depends on ARCH_OMAP3 || ARCH_AM33XX
>  
> +config DRIVER_SPI_DSPI
> +	tristate "Freescale DSPI SPI Master driver"
> +	depends on ARCH_VF610
> +	default y

Please no default y for optional features.

> +	help
> +	  This enables support for the Freescale DSPI controller in master
> +	  mode. VF610 platform uses the controller.
> +
>  endif
>  
>  endmenu

> +static void hz_to_spi_baud(char *pbr, char *br, int speed_hz,
> +			   unsigned long clkrate)
> +{
> +	/* Valid baud rate pre-scaler values */
> +	int pbr_tbl[4] = {2, 3, 5, 7};
> +	int brs[16] = {	2,	4,	6,	8,
> +		16,	32,	64,	128,
> +		256,	512,	1024,	2048,
> +		4096,	8192,	16384,	32768 };
> +	int scale_needed, scale, minscale = INT_MAX;
> +	int i, j;
> +
> +	scale_needed = clkrate / speed_hz;
> +	if (clkrate % speed_hz)
> +		scale_needed++;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(brs); i++)
> +		for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(pbr_tbl); j++) {
> +			scale = brs[i] * pbr_tbl[j];
> +			if (scale >= scale_needed) {
> +				if (scale < minscale) {
> +					minscale = scale;
> +					*br = i;
> +					*pbr = j;
> +				}
> +				break;
> +			}
> +		}
> +
> +	if (minscale == INT_MAX) {
> +		pr_warn("Can not find valid baud rate,speed_hz is %d,"
> +			"clkrate is %ld, we use the max prescaler value.\n",
> +			speed_hz, clkrate);

Use dev_* for drivers please.

> +		*pbr = ARRAY_SIZE(pbr_tbl) - 1;
> +		*br =  ARRAY_SIZE(brs) - 1;
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static void ns_delay_scale(char *psc, char *sc, int delay_ns,
> +		unsigned long clkrate)
> +{
> +	int pscale_tbl[4] = {1, 3, 5, 7};
> +	int scale_needed, scale, minscale = INT_MAX;
> +	int i, j;
> +	u32 remainder;
> +
> +	scale_needed = div_u64_rem((u64)delay_ns * clkrate, NSEC_PER_SEC,
> +			&remainder);
> +	if (remainder)
> +		scale_needed++;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pscale_tbl); i++)
> +		for (j = 0; j <= SPI_CTAR_SCALE_BITS; j++) {
> +			scale = pscale_tbl[i] * (2 << j);
> +			if (scale >= scale_needed) {
> +				if (scale < minscale) {
> +					minscale = scale;
> +					*psc = i;
> +					*sc = j;
> +				}
> +				break;
> +			}
> +		}
> +
> +	if (minscale == INT_MAX) {
> +		pr_warn("Cannot find correct scale values for %dns "
> +			"delay at clkrate %ld, using max prescaler value",
> +			delay_ns, clkrate);
> +		*psc = ARRAY_SIZE(pscale_tbl) - 1;
> +		*sc = SPI_CTAR_SCALE_BITS;
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static u32 dspi_xchg_single(struct fsl_dspi *dspi, u32 in)
> +{
> +	const uint32_t sr_ready = (SPI_SR_EOQF | SPI_SR_RFDF);
> +
> +	writel(in, dspi->base + SPI_PUSHR);
> +
> +	while ((readl(dspi->base + SPI_SR) & sr_ready) != sr_ready)
> +		;
> +
> +	writel(sr_ready, dspi->base + SPI_SR);
> +
> +	return readl(dspi->base + SPI_POPR);
> +}
> +
> +static const void *dspi_load_and_advance(const void *buffer,
> +					 size_t word_size, uint32_t *word)
> +{
> +	if (!buffer) {
> +		*word = 0;
> +		return NULL;
> +	}
> +
> +	switch (word_size) {
> +	case 2:
> +		*word = *(const uint16_t *)buffer;
> +		break;
> +	case 1:
> +		*word = *(const uint8_t *)buffer;
> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	return buffer + word_size;
> +}
> +
> +static void *dspi_store_and_advance(void *buffer,
> +				    size_t word_size, uint32_t word)
> +{
> +	if (!buffer)
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	switch (word_size) {
> +	case 2:
> +		*(uint16_t *)buffer = word;
> +		break;
> +	case 1:
> +		*(uint8_t *)buffer  = word;
> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	return buffer + word_size;
> +}
> +
> +
> +static void dspi_do_transfer(struct spi_device *spi,
> +			     struct spi_transfer *transfer,
> +			     bool last)
> +{
> +	size_t i;
> +	void *rx;
> +	const void *tx;
> +	unsigned int flags;
> +	struct fsl_dspi *dspi = to_dspi(spi->master);
> +	const size_t word_size = spi->bits_per_word <= 8 ? 1 : 2;
> +	const size_t count = transfer->len / word_size;
> +
> +	flags = SPI_PUSHR_PCS(spi->chip_select)
> +		| SPI_PUSHR_CTAS(spi->chip_select)
> +		| SPI_PUSHR_EOQ
> +		| SPI_PUSHR_CONT;
> +
> +	tx = transfer->tx_buf;
> +	rx = transfer->rx_buf;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> +		uint32_t in, out;
> +
> +		if (i == count - 1 &&
> +		    (last || transfer->cs_change))
> +			flags &= ~SPI_PUSHR_CONT;
> +
> +		tx = dspi_load_and_advance(tx, word_size, &out);
> +		in = dspi_xchg_single(dspi, flags | out);
> +		rx = dspi_store_and_advance(rx, word_size, in);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static int dspi_transfer(struct spi_device *spi,
> +			 struct spi_message *message)
> +{
> +	struct spi_transfer *transfer;
> +
> +	message->actual_length = 0;
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry(transfer, &message->transfers, transfer_list) {
> +
> +		if (spi->bits_per_word > 8 &&
> +		    transfer->len % 2)
> +			dev_err(spi->master->dev,
> +				"Transfer doesn't contain exact number of SPI "
> +				"words. Last partial word will be truncated");
> +
> +		dspi_do_transfer(spi, transfer,
> +				 list_is_last(&transfer->transfer_list,
> +					      &message->transfers));
> +		message->actual_length += transfer->len;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int dspi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
> +{
> +	struct fsl_dspi *dspi = to_dspi(spi->master);
> +	unsigned char br = 0, pbr = 0, pcssck = 0, cssck = 0;
> +	unsigned char pasc = 0, asc = 0, fmsz = 0;
> +	unsigned long clkrate;
> +
> +	if (4 <= spi->bits_per_word && spi->bits_per_word <= 16)
> +		fmsz = spi->bits_per_word - 1;
> +	else
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	clkrate = clk_get_rate(dspi->clk);
> +	hz_to_spi_baud(&pbr, &br, spi->max_speed_hz, clkrate);
> +
> +	/* Set PCS to SCK delay scale values */
> +	ns_delay_scale(&pcssck, &cssck, dspi->cs_sck_delay, clkrate);
> +
> +	/* Set After SCK delay scale values */
> +	ns_delay_scale(&pasc, &asc, dspi->sck_cs_delay, clkrate);
> +
> +	writel(SPI_CTAR_FMSZ(fmsz)
> +	       | SPI_CTAR_CPOL(spi->mode & SPI_CPOL ? 1 : 0)
> +	       | SPI_CTAR_CPHA(spi->mode & SPI_CPHA ? 1 : 0)
> +	       | SPI_CTAR_LSBFE(spi->mode & SPI_LSB_FIRST ? 1 : 0)
> +	       | SPI_CTAR_PCSSCK(pcssck)
> +	       | SPI_CTAR_CSSCK(cssck)
> +	       | SPI_CTAR_PASC(pasc)
> +	       | SPI_CTAR_ASC(asc)
> +	       | SPI_CTAR_PBR(pbr)
> +	       | SPI_CTAR_BR(br),
> +	       dspi->base + SPI_CTAR(spi->chip_select));
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int dspi_probe(struct device_d *dev)
> +{
> +	struct resource *io;
> +	struct fsl_dspi *dspi;
> +	struct spi_master *master;
> +	struct device_node *np = dev->device_node;
> +
> +	int ret = 0;
> +	uint32_t bus_num = 0;
> +	uint32_t cs_num;
> +
> +	dspi = xzalloc(sizeof(*dspi));
> +
> +	dspi->devtype_data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> +	if (!dspi->devtype_data) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "can't get devtype_data\n");
> +		ret = -EFAULT;
> +		goto free_memory;
> +	}
> +
> +	master = &dspi->master;
> +	master->dev = dev;
> +	master->bus_num = dev->id;
> +	master->setup = dspi_setup;
> +	master->transfer = dspi_transfer;
> +
> +	ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "spi-num-chipselects", &cs_num);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "can't get spi-num-chipselects\n");
> +		goto free_memory;
> +	}
> +	master->num_chipselect = cs_num;
> +
> +	ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "bus-num", &bus_num);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "can't get bus-num\n");
> +		goto free_memory;
> +	}
> +	master->bus_num = bus_num;

I don't think the presence of a bus-num property should be enforced. It
seems nobody has reviewed the binding since normally such a property
shouldn't even exist. You can honor it if it's present, but shouldn't
enforce it.

> +
> +	of_property_read_u32(dev->device_node, "fsl,spi-cs-sck-delay",
> +			     &dspi->cs_sck_delay);
> +	of_property_read_u32(dev->device_node, "fsl,spi-sck-cs-delay",
> +			     &dspi->sck_cs_delay);
> +
> +	io = dev_request_mem_resource(dev, 0);
> +	if (IS_ERR(io))
> +		return PTR_ERR(io);

I don't care much about cleaning up properly in the probe error pathes
in barebox, but now that you started with "goto free_memory" in the
driver, you can use it here aswell ;)

Sascha


-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Embedded]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux