On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 08:12:07PM +0000, Trent Piepho wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-10-17 at 09:50 +0200, Steffen Trumtrar wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Steffen Trumtrar <s.trumtrar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/dts/socfpga.dtsi | 10 ++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/socfpga.dtsi b/arch/arm/dts/socfpga.dtsi
> > index d16758fdab46..66d7f21dc6a3 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/dts/socfpga.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm/dts/socfpga.dtsi
> > @@ -49,3 +49,13 @@
> > &f2s_sdram_ref_clk {
> > clock-frequency = <0>;
> > };
> > +
> > +&watchdog0 {
> > + resets = <&rst L4WD0_RESET>;
> > + reset-names = "dw-wdt";
>
> This is the official binding? The reset-names property is supposed to
> be the name of the reset from the perspective of the device being
> described, e.g. the watchdog. Not the name from the perspective of the
> reset controller. Rather than "dw-wdt", the name should something like
> "reset", which clearly doesn't add much information, which is why the
> reset-names property is supposed to be optional.
>
There is no "official" binding. I wasn't really sure about this property
and just tried to derive from other bindings. I don't care for this one,
so I'm okay with removing it.
Thanks,
Steffen
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
