On 03.08.2016 07:47, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 01:55:39PM +0200, Wadim Egorov wrote: >> >> On 20.07.2016 19:35, Andrey Smirnov wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 7:17 AM, Wadim Egorov <w.egorov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> This driver comes from the u-boot (v2016.01). >>> I'd suggest this to be moved to "drivers/clocksource" and converted to >>> a proper driver that binds against DT node and doesn't use a CONFIG_* >>> symbol to determine its base address. >> I want to use this driver in the SPL part later. The SRAM we can use is >> very limited on the RK3288. So I don't want to add more DT code here. > Do we need a full barebox as SPL? This usually means we have to build > barebox twice which is not very convenient. Can we instead build the SPL > code into the barebox PBL? This is what I have done for i.MX. > > Sascha No, we don't need a full barebox as SPL. It should be possible to build barebox and the SPL part with one build. _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
