On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 12:54:05PM +0200, Alexander Kurz wrote: > Hi, > thanks for applying this quickly, unfortunately this patch is not > correct. > > The observed MC13892 is attached to a MC508 in two different variants of > e-book readers. When .max_speed_hz is set faster than 16MHz (default is > 20MHz since patch 6e18b3a48ee4), the device is identified as > > Found MC13892 ID: 0x0067fe [Rev: 3.6] > > while indeed this device is a > > Found MC13892 ID: 0x0045d4 [Rev: 2.4] > > Is it possible to drop this patch or should I post a revert patch on it? It's still in next, so I just dropped it. You can send a corrected patch if you wish. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
