On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 09:46:54PM +0800, Du Huanpeng wrote:
> From: Du Huanpeng <u74147@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> maybe this patch is not very necessary, but this make we have
> opportunity to use simplified version of printf.
> printf ("%.*s", n, str);
I see no real value in this patch since we do have a full printf.
Without full printf we likely also do not need readline.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
