On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 08:36 +0100, Teresa Remmet wrote:
>
> +struct of_fixup_status_data {
> + char *node;
const char *node.
I think path would be a better name, as node usually is a device_node
pointer, not a path.
> + bool status;
> +};
> +
> +static int of_fixup_status(struct device_node *root, void *context)
> +{
> + struct of_fixup_status_data *data = context;
const struct of_fixup_status_data *data
> + struct device_node *node;
> +
> + node = of_find_node_by_path_or_alias(root, data->node);
> + if (!node)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + if (data->status)
> + return of_device_enable(node);
> + else
> + return of_device_disable(node);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * of_register_set_status_fixup - register fix up to set status of nodes
> + * Register a fixup to enable or disable a node in the devicet tree by
> + * passing the path or alias.
> + */
> +int of_register_set_status_fixup(char *node, bool status)
(const char *path, bool status)
> +{
> + struct of_fixup_status_data *data;
> +
> + data = xzalloc(sizeof(*data));
> + data->node = node;
> + data->status = status;
> +
> + return of_register_fixup(of_fixup_status, (void *)data);
> +}
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
