On Wed, 2015-12-16 at 11:52 +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 10:37:34PM +0000, Trent Piepho wrote: > > From d8f4428244b3c7009a6ef7d5a97a00747cd19472 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Trent Piepho <tpiepho@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 14:19:34 -0800 > > Subject: [PATCH 2/2] socfpga: Find partition with environment via device tree > > The subject in this mail is wrong. The correct subject is here, but 'git > am' takes the one from the mail. IMAP and POP aren't supported at work so I can't use git send-email and must instead manually import the patches into a mailer that supports EWS. I must have forgotten to copy the subject on that one. > I thought over it and I am fine with the approach of putting the > filename as an additional property into the barebox,environment node. > > Also I am fine with the "of_path: Fix bug with partitions, simply code" > patch, only I can not find the commitish that broke the partition code. I used my local rebased branch by mistake, it should have been 75b682795eafb2385556a9642f09e0af96a1264a > I somewhat lost track over your outstanding patches. Could you resend > all of them in a single series? Ok. Have you considered using patchwork for this list? I've found it pretty useful for keeping track of patches. _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
