On Mon, 2015-12-07 at 11:40 -0800, Andrey Smirnov wrote: > On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Trent Piepho <tpiepho@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, 2015-12-06 at 23:52 -0800, Andrey Smirnov wrote: > >> + > >> + imx_thermal->sensor.name = of_get_property(dev->device_node, > >> + > >> "barebox,sensor-name", > >> + NULL); > > > > Wouldn't aliases the proper OF way to do this? > > I must admit I am not familiar with the feature you are talking about > (or maybe I am just not understanding what you mean well), can you > give me a very brief example? Given my ignorance I wouldn't be > surprised that it is. There is an aliases section at the root of the OF tree, which has properties set to a phandle for the device the property's name serves as an alias for. There was a patch to this list last week sometime that added alias support to the at24 driver for naming eeproms. _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
