Hi Jan, On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 09:04:46AM +0100, Jan Remmet wrote: > On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 05:22:58PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > > There are several use cases where a redundant Linux system is needed. The > > barebox,bootstate framework provides the building blocks to model different > > use cases without the need to start from the scratch over and over again. > Hello, > is there any reason why this wasn't applied? I tested it and it works fine. > There is also a watchdog handling now in commands/boot.c so we can rework the > bootchooser. I think the best reason is that we just haven't done it yet... I just merged Marcs state framework enhancements series which contains some dependencies for the bootchooser. With this I think it's just a matter of resending the latest version of the bootchooser and doing a final review. Marc will probably resend it soon ;) Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
