On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 09:06:46PM +0000, Trent Piepho wrote: > The OF code for parsing bus-width would only add the specified width > to those the driver might have already set capability flags for. > > Because of this, if the driver had set 8 or 4 bit width, it wasn't > possible for the DT to specify that fewer pins were used on the board > and a smaller width was necessary. > > Change this so the width in the DT overrides whatever widths the > driver says it supports. There is no reason to have an incorrect > device tree and it makes far more sense for the DT to override the > driver default than for the driver default to override the DT. > > The widths the driver puts in host_caps before calling mci_of_parse() > are considered the default if the DT doesn't specify bus-width. This > should cause the least amount of change to existing boards, as despite > a comment that no bus-width meant to use 1 bit, using the driver > default is what was really happening. > > Unfortunately, half of existing drivers default to the largest width > they support while the other half default to the smallest. Boards > should just stick the width in the device tree. > > Signed-off-by: Trent Piepho <tpiepho@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/mci/mci-core.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- > include/mci.h | 2 ++ > 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) Applied, thanks Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox