On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 01:09:20PM +0100, Stefan Christ wrote: > Hi Sascha, > > > > the patchstack first refactors the phyCARD-i.MX6 and phyFLEX-i.MX6 to a common > > > phytec-som-imx6. Then some phyFLEX-i.MX6 variants and the new phyCORE-i.MX6 are > > > added plus some environment updates and one image rename patch. > > > > > > > The Phytec i.MX6 boards all have an EEPROM, right? > > No, it's possible to get a board without an EEPROM and we have some of them > lying around here. > > > Does it have the memory setup encoded somewhere? > > So no, the memory is not encoded anywhere on the module. > > > It gets increasingly hard picking the right image for the Phytec boards. > > Yeah. We are discussing some solutions for that like GPIOs, EEPROM or EFuses, > but nothing has emerged from that and they are only viable for new products. Yeah, I think it's worth solving this issue somehow, it would make using the Phytec boards a lot easier, even if it's only for new products. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
