On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 05:54:59PM +0100, Alexander Aring wrote: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 09:29:53AM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > This series has some updates for the memory test. The output and the > > code are made more compact and some additional options are added. Also > > the remap_range function is reworked. > > > ... > > What means 0xdeadbeef here? okay, I it's guess the pattern argument which doesn't exist anymore. I run memtest now with: memtest -t -u on the RPi and it seems the first progressbar range of "0/3" - "1/3" runs faster than the last range of "1/3" - "3/3". This sounds like that remap_range does not full manipulate the range of page tables (the range at the start address). Okay we can't full use the range, because we need to be PAGE_ALIGN, but the whole first range of "0/3" - "1/3" sounds not correct for me (it's bigger than PAGE_ALIGN). Maybe everything is correct and the first address room is always a little bit faster than the others, but I don't think that. I haven't tried to debug this issue. Can somebody confirm that on an other arm board? - Alex _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
