On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 01:49:41PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > Wihtout this patch, when using more than one state device an alias is > mandatory, otherwise the there will be two state devices with the name state. Are there really two devices? I hope there's a -EEXIST somewhere... > > This patch fixes the limitation by using the device node's name if no alias is > defined. The node name is not necessarily unique. Also you might end up with state names like "state@0" which probably also is not what we want. Maybe making the alias mandatory for multiple state devices is not the worst behaviour. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
