We should print the block number before increasing it, not afterwards. Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- common/imx-bbu-nand-fcb.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/common/imx-bbu-nand-fcb.c b/common/imx-bbu-nand-fcb.c index d2bfedb..5b984d4 100644 --- a/common/imx-bbu-nand-fcb.c +++ b/common/imx-bbu-nand-fcb.c @@ -275,8 +275,8 @@ static int imx6_bbu_erase(struct mtd_info *mtd) while (len > 0) { pr_debug("erasing at 0x%08llx\n", offset); if (mtd_block_isbad(mtd, offset)) { - offset += mtd->erasesize; pr_debug("erase skip block @ 0x%08llx\n", offset); + offset += mtd->erasesize; continue; } @@ -308,9 +308,9 @@ static int imx6_bbu_write_firmware(struct mtd_info *mtd, int block, void *buf, s buf, offset, len); if (mtd_block_isbad(mtd, offset)) { + pr_debug("write skip block @ 0x%08llx\n", offset); offset += mtd->erasesize; block++; - pr_debug("write skip block @ 0x%08llx\n", offset); continue; } -- 2.1.4 _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox