On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:47:46PM -0700, Andrey Smirnov wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 05:11:30AM -0700, Andrey Smirnov wrote: > >> --- > >> drivers/firmware/Kconfig | 2 +- > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > This patch lacks a signed-off-by. Could you resend it? > > I figured tat since this was just a one line in a build configuration > file it would be too trivial for copyright assignment, but I can add > the signed-off-by line in the next version of the patch. Indeed it's trivial and nobody will doubt this was your work, but where should I draw the line? Always insisting on the signed-off-by helps us not thinking about this topic anymore. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
