On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 10:59:41AM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > On 04/02/2015 10:55 AM, Lucas Stach wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, den 02.04.2015, 10:35 +0200 schrieb Jean-Christophe > > PLAGNIOL-VILLARD: > >> On 00:33 Wed 01 Apr , Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > >>> This patches makes a standard emacs to recognise the files as makefiles. > >> not a fan of vi or emacs stuff in file > >> > >> btw I plan to drop the images/ and move them back to the ARCH > >> > > I'm not sure if this is time spent well. > > > > Moving the generated images _again_ will get you into some serious > > discussions with the people integrating barebox into BSP builds. We > > finally settled for a single directory going forward and changing this > > is not a good idea. > > +1 > > > Or did you mean just moving the rules out of images/, but keeping the > > generated binaries there? This might in fact be doable. > > On the first sight there's some marvell image related > doubling/copy-paste leftovers in ARCH and in images/. > reminds me to send patches for RPi build which doesn't place the barebox image into "images/", otherwise I get a [0]. It's placed in root directory of barebox "barebox.bin". :-) - Alex [0] https://www.mail-archive.com/ptxdist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg09539.html _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
